THEATRE
REVIEW:
“SWEET, SMART RODGERS & HART” at the Poway Center for the Performing
Arts
KPBS
AIRDATE: January 12, 1994
With music by
Richard Rodgers and lyrics by Lorenz Hart, you can't lose. Or can you?
When writer/director Steven Suskin conceived of "Sweet, Smart
Rodgers & Hart," he was pretty sure he'd have a winner on his
hands. And he oughta know. Besides being co-producer of the much
acclaimed "Falsettoland" and "Speed-the-Plow," Suskin also
co-produced "Forever Plaid" in 26 cities, including this one, where
it made three visits. Not only that,
but Suskin is a welll-known chronicler of the history of musical theater in
America, having written three seminal books on the subject. So what went wrong with this co-pro between
Pasadena Playhouse and the Poway Center for the Performing Arts?
It's not the
onstage Ferrante and Teicher twins, Kevin Cole and David Snyder on the pair of
pianos, playing their guts out. It's
probably not the musical arrangements by Cole, although, sticking close to the
original conceptions, some sound pretty dated.
God knows it's not the material; Rodgers and Hart, in their tempestuous,
near-quarter-century relationship, penned about 650 songs between 1919 and
1943. One could quibble with Suskin's
selections; not all the biggies are among the 31 he chose to present. But enough of them are -- incredible,
imperishable songs like "Betwitched," "Where or When," "Thou Swell," "(I'll
Take) Manhattan." And some of the
lesser-known numbers are quite charming and very witty. It's not the sequential arrangement of
songs, either. They cover the turf of
love, hope and desire. Or, more aptly
for the depressive Hart, hope for love, lost love, unrequited love -- offset by
clever, punny humor.
Onstage, things
are technically simple, but that's fairly standard for musical revues. That's what makes them so attractive for
community and regional theaters, as well as traveling productions: they're basic, and low-budget. The proscenium here is fringed with a kind
of Wurlitzer look, and in the background there are drops of sheet music,
attractively lit. But downstage, the
costumes are singularly unflattering -- in both acts. And besides not looking their best, the cast just has no
panache. And that's what revues in
general and Rodgers and Hart songs in particular require most of all.
There are three
women and one man in the cast. The
voices are fine, but there's no charisma, no real spunk. The first act costumes could be a metaphor
for the whole evening: they have the
pseudo-flash of sewn-on spangles, but they're still a basic, uninspired
grey.
The standout
performer is veteran Karen Morrow, who gets most of the comic and character
songs, and really knows how to put them over.
She's a hoot in numbers like "To Keep My Love Alive," and
heart-rending in "Why Can't I?' and "Glad to Be Unhappy." In revues, there should be a show-stopper
for every singer. But there isn't. The direction and staging, by Suskin and
Onna White, are partly to blame.
There's an awful lot of just standing around, mostly because only two of
the four singers can dance. When they
do, things get more lively, but never really polished. Everyone seems to be counting beats. And the show has already played Pasadena, so
it should be pretty slick by now.
Without a clear plot or characters, revues run the risk of being just a
pleasant, superficial evening at the theater, easily forgotten. But that shouldn't be true of songs that
have lasted for fifty years; both the writers and the material should be
memorable. Somehow, despite all the
best intentions here, we don't get enough about the composer and lyricist and
though we may love their message, we're not enthralled with the
messengers. That makes it easy to
forget what you're hearing while you're hearing it.
I'm Pat Launer,
for KPBS radio.
©1994 Patté Productions Inc.