THEATRE
REVIEW:
“OLEANNA”
at the Old Globe Theatre
KPBS
AIRDATE: May 25, 1994
Playwright David
Mamet often takes demonic delight in tracing the fine line between standard
business practices and sheer thuggery.
It was all about Hollywood hype in "Speed-the-Plow," and the
slimy swampland of real estate in the Pulitzer Prize-winning "Glengarry Glen
Ross." In "Oleanna," his
latest, perhaps most controversial work, Mamet tramps over the same turf, but
this time he drags us into the hallowed halls of the Academe. He sets his rifle sights on pedantry,
hypocrisy, elitism, and power plays; Mamet aims and shoots, with one explosion
splattering political correctness and intellectual terrorism.
"Oleanna"
pits a man against a woman, a teacher against a learner, a privileged pedagogue
against an under-privileged whiner, a supposed free thinker against a slavish
follower of rights and rules, a supercilious pedant who tries to force his
charges to think against a confused and credulous pupil who needs to be told
what to think.
This cast of
characters is distilled down to two:
the professor John and the student Carol. She comes to his office to question her failing grade on a paper,
and to say that she doesn't understand anything he's been talking about all
semester.
(SOUND BITE:
CAROL: I don't understand. I don't understand what anything
means... and I walk around. From morning 'til night: with this one thought in my head. I'm stupid.
JOHN: No one thinks you're stupid.
CAROL: No?
What am I...?
JOHN: I...
CAROL: ... what am I then?
JOHN: I think you're angry. Many people are.)
Distracted by last-minute negotiations on a
new house, and a surprise party to celebrate -- prematurely, it turns out --
his promotion and tenure, John nonetheless tries to rewrite the teacher-student
relationship and arranges a private tutorial for Carol. Then Mamet pulls the trigger and all hell
breaks loose.
We don't like
either of these characters. She is
wimpy, inarticulate, unable to think for herself. He is pompous, hyperverbal, condescending. But in that halting, fragmented, classically
Mametian dialogue, they both tell truths.
His cynically concern the sorry state of the Academe, the
inanities of the tenure process, higher education assumed to be a 'right' and
reduced to "ritualized
hazing." And her truths are
buried in that minefield of sexual harassment, abuse of power, academic
exploitation. Both take their arguments
too far. Each refuses to acquiesce to
the power of the other, and disaster ensues.
She moves terrifyingly, inexorably from charges of sexual harassment to
attempted rape. He moves from
mollifying to anger to violence. The PC
police have brought out their billy clubs.
Political correctness has done its dirtiest of deeds.
In some of
Mamet's most muscular writing, Carol's lack of understanding in act one is
echoed in John's incredulity in act two.
(SOUND
BITE:
JOHN: What does this mean?
CAROL: I thought you knew.
JOHN: What.
What does it mean.
CAROL: You tried to rape me. According to the law.
JOHN: ...what...?
CAROL: You tried to rape me. I was leaving this office, you
"pressed" yourself into me.
You "pressed" your body into me.
JOHN: ... I ...
CAROL: My Group has told your lawyer that we may
pursue criminal charges.
JOHN: ....no....
CAROL: ... under the statute. I am told.
It was battery.
JOHN: .... no ....
CAROL: Yes.
And attempted rape. That's
right.
Director Jack
O'Brien has masterfully spotlighted the subtleties and the ambiguities of the
play in this highly effective and deeply disturbing Old Globe production. The terrific technical work is all metaphor;
there's no ceiling in the stark set; light streams in brilliantly, but
fades. And periodically, we hear the
cold, hard slam of prison doors. (SOUND BITE: slamming door)
Onstage,
William Anton and Kathleen Dennehy take commanding control of the characters.
When Mamet deals, the deck is always stacked -- against the woman. We don't like what she's doing, we don't
believe her rapid transformation, but we do understand. This is very potent, provocative theater. Prepare yourself for an extended evening;
the play itself is short, but your post-theater debate may last long into the
night.
I'm Pat Launer,
for KPBS radio.
©1994 Patté Productions Inc.