THEATRE REVIEW:
“THE THIRD VOICE OF THE
NIGHTJAR” at the Fritz Theater
KPBS AIRDATE: APRIL 15, 1998
So,
here’s the paradox: ‘The barber of
Seville shaves all the men in Seville if and only if they do not shave
themselves. Does the barber shave
himself?’ Now, this may be totally
inconsequential to you, but it’s the kind of thing that can torture a
mathematician, and, in the case of a brilliant one like Bertrand Russell, it
can throw his entire life’s work into question. Because it defies logic, the main domain of mathematicians.
In
“The Third Voice of the Nightjar,” there’s a mathematician, and there’s also a
constant defiance of logic and explicable reality. In the story of Bertrand Russell that inspired the play, the great
philosopher spent his nights wondering and wandering in the woods, where he
never solved the problem, but he did learn the three different calls of the
nocturnal bird, the nightjar.
In
Karin Williams’ 21st century cautionary tale, the mathematician spends his
sleepless nights cruising the Internet, a place that, like the dark forest of
fairy tale and myth, is, according to the playwright’s notes, “a vast and
uncharted wilderness... ripe with the potential to fulfill a wanderer’s wildest
dreams... or to become his undoing.”
All
of the above happens in “Nightjar,” which takes place in three simultaneous
realities (or unrealities): cyberspace,
dream space and real space. For the
audience, as for the main character, it’s hard to distinguish one from the other.
Set
simply and surreally, it’s a wonderfully magical piece, rife with evocative
language, dark as the forest but also witty and clever and
thought-provoking. The very talented
Williams, Fritz resident playwright, has created her ripest, most satisfying
work, though it’s quite enigmatic. The
ambiguity is obviously intentional, but things do get a bit too murky at
times. Was someone murdered, and if so,
who and by whom? When the mathematician
searches for meaning in logic, and goes for solace to Cyberia, what does he
ultimately find? And who does he wind
up with? His devoted wife? His cyber-obsession? Or some product of his
drug-addled, insomniac imagination?
If
you can deal with ambiguity and incertitude, if you’re a Net-surfer yourself,
if you’re titillated by the thought of cybersex and the mysteries of life, and
the magic of theater, you’re gonna love this show. I certainly did. It’s
beautifully executed, spellbinding, sexy and perplexing.
Bryan
Bevell has done a masterful job of casting and direction. Tim West aptly captures another zhlubby,
middle-aged Everyman gone awry. He’s
lured into online sex with the seething, leather-clad Michelle Hanks, the
alter-ego and cyber-persona of Michael Hummel’s Shawn, a waiter and drug dealer
who’s sexually irresistible to males and females. This is Hummel’s best performance ever -- a focused, centered,
knockout portrayal that oozes sex and humor and menace. The cast is rounded out by the no-nonsense
Beth Bayliss, playing the faithful wife who gets sucked into the online
madness; a cynically deadpan Lamont Thompson as Lynch, computer programmer and
terrorist; and the redoubtable Sarah Gunnell as the object of everyone’s
concern and desire, a woman who may be a man, a runaway, a murderer, a victim
-- or someone who just wants to press the Escape key and start her life all
over.
You
see, in cyberspace, you can be whoever you want to be, or whoever someone wants
or needs you to be. Online morals and
ethics and expectations are different, disarming. Truth is hard to discern.
But, despite the overall darkness of the piece, the loneliness and
isolation, the soullessness and desperation, people are reaching out,
trying to establish some sort of relationship and community. In the end, it may be possible to reconfigure
yourself, to start again, and even to get some sleep.
Do
yourself a favor. Boot up, log on, and
glue your attention to “The Third Voice of the Nightjar.”
I’m
Pat Launer, KPBS radio.
©1998 Patté Productions
Inc.